Welcome to the Friday Loose Bloggers Consortium where twelve of us write on the same topic. Today’s topic has been chosen by our esrstwhile LBC blogger Magpie who has retired. The ten other bloggers who write regularly are, in alphabetical order, Delirious, gaelikaa, Grannymar, Maria SF, ocdwriter, Padmum, Paul, Rohit, The Old Fossil and Will. Do drop in on their blogs and see what their take is on this week’s topic. Since some of them may post late, do give some allowance for that too!
Dominion: n.
1. Control or the exercise of control; sovereignty:
2. A territory or sphere of influence or control; a realm.
3. often Dominion Abbr. Dom. One of the self-governing nations within the British Commonwealth.
Stewardship: n.
Managing another’s property, finances, or other affairs. (In the context of this topic, managing a colonial possession.)
I wonder if Magpie quite had this in his mind, knowing that an Indian wag will take pot shots at that topic.
India was offered Dominion status by the British, but chose to go the Independent Republic route, while retaining a connection with Britain through the Commeonwealth.
Being an Anglophile, I used to believe that, that choice was a mistake and that India should not have become independent, particularly when, what the old Colonist Churchill’s prediction; “Power will go to rascals, rogues, freebooters; All leaders will be of low caliber & men of straw; They’ll have sweet tongues & silly hearts; They will fight amongst themselves for power & the two countries will be lost in political squabbles; A day would come when even air & water will be taxed.” came true.
I am not so sure now as I see Britain experiencing exactly the same predicament, that Churchill predicted for India and Pakistan. I wonder what that old warhorse will be feeling wherever he is.
What goes around, comes around?


Our countries are only as good as those people we vote in to lead us.
Grannymar recently posted..The day the bishop hit me
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:04
Alas, so very true.
Very engaging. The political class in UK certainly has contributed to and presided over falling standards. However take a look around, can you think of any other world power which is better? Even as late as last year, when some person of third world origin pointed out that the MP expenses scandal is nothing compared to the corruption in other countries (maybe India), the retort was “I don’t care about what happens in some tinpot country, my MP has to be scrupulous”.
srinivas chillara recently posted..The VOC, but who is the customer?
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:05
Is it not exactly what we say about our MPs and MLAs here too? What difference does that wishful thinking make?
srinivas c Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 22:25
I don’t think so. I think there is much more acceptance both overt and tacit here. I think they are not so much corrupt as apathetic. Here I think it is both.
srinivas c recently posted..An extended entertaining tete a tete
He’d probably be wishing they’d been better stewards of their own borders.
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:06
Not the Churchill that I have read about. He would most likely wish that he could come back and kick some butt.
Not much stewardship in the UK, as sc points out. Standards of behaviour by public figures are atrocious and the population is struggling harder and harder to make ends meet while the rich get richer. More hardship than stewardship.
Nick recently posted..Strained loyalties
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:07
Bar a very few countries, alas, the same can be said of the entire world today Nick.
Theocorporatocracy Rules.
Amen
XO
WWW
wisewebwoman recently posted..X is for Xenia
Rummuser Reply:
April 28th, 2012 at 20:57
I love that word.”By words the mind is winged” -Aristophanes,
Wisewebwoman must live in the U. S. because the corporations and the obscenely wealthy are about to take dominion over our country.
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:07
She lives across the border in Canada actually.
I don’t really know history very well. Was Pakistan also under British rule? If so do you think that if both India and Pakistan remained under British rule, that things would be different today?
Delirious recently posted..Friday Loose Bloggers Consortium: Dominion and Stewardship
Rummuser Reply:
April 28th, 2012 at 21:21
Yes, Pakistan did not exist before 1947 and the price that India and Pakistan paid for independence from Britain was to partition one nation into two. You can read more about it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_India
No, I do not think so. In any case, a war battered Britain could not have managed to keep the colony intact as they simply could not have managed the Indian armed forces which were formed for WW II. They could not have taken the risk of mutiny at that point of time.
It is Raju’s favourite statement. “We don’t have to go up to the developed countries levels in all fields. They will soon join us at our levels”….and it is coming true!
Padmini Natarajan recently posted..Dominion and Stewardship
blackwatertown Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 02:02
Ooh ouch!
I suppose I’d prefer to be run by our own eejits rather than some other bunch of eejits far away.
blackwatertown recently posted..The missing slaves of Belfast
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:10
Yes, a very nice way of putting it.
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:08
Who would have thought that we will live to see that day!
I love that world! I will use it for sure.
Padmini Natarajan recently posted..Dominion and Stewardship
Rummuser Reply:
April 28th, 2012 at 21:31
I suppose that you meant Theocorporatocracy used by wisewebwoman. She will be delighted I am sure. You could have commented under her comment directly.
Rummuser Reply:
April 29th, 2012 at 21:09
I suppose that this comment is meant for WWW! If it is, I love it too.